ROI in HR?

December 23rd, 2010 | 2,505 views | Rss Feed

Some HR people are satisfied to believe they are adding value. Others want to ensure they are.

Proving to ourselves, let alone others, that we are making a positive contribution is very important. It removes any mistaken illusions and helps us focus on being a greater asset to both the organisation and to those who work in it.

There has been discussion around the idea of using metrics in HR to evaluate ROI and how it can be done.

The downloadable Newsletter from The McQuaig Institute looks at these important points and offers some concrete suggestions for not just creating some appropriate metrics but also how to use them to add further value.

The article refers to a couple of formats that can be obtained. Feel free to use the bookmark to email us for copies and, for that matter, to ask questions or request assistance in achieving your goal to be the best you can be.



Leadership — The Barrier To High Performance?

August 13th, 2010 | 3,811 views | Rss Feed

The situation.

One of the heaviest millstones around the neck of company performance is leadership or, to be more precise, the lack of it.

In our work, we see many organisations and there are significant gaps in morale and performance levels between a well-led team and “the rest”.

We also get told by HR departments that leadership is lacking inside their organisation and it is destroying potential.

Well-led teams are teams.  They take pride in their achievements, they produce good quality, have high productivity and take responsibility for their work.

They are also innovative, flexible towards change and “wow” their customers.

And the others?

Other “teams” lack these positive elements, they “just do a job”, giving them no real satisfaction.  On top of this, there are greater attrition levels, adding significantly to the costs of the business as well as upsetting careers.

What is done about this important issue?

Lots! Hundreds of crores of Rupees are spent by India Inc. on Leadership Development, Leadership Competency Mapping, and more. All this wipes the same amount straight off the bottom line.

And for what?  Maintaining the status quo.

The real impact is so small, it makes one wonder if companies would be better off not undertaking such interventions and instead instantly boost their profits.

Hand it over to L&D?

Unfortunately, it is most often treated as an L&D challenge: how do we change this person’s habits?

I have just come across a blog post that underlines why this just does not work: http://zenhabits.net/enjoy-the-habit/

“… you’d be surprised how many people try to force themselves to do things they don’t enjoy. They try to instill “discipline” because they think it’ll make them a better person or give them a better life, but what kind of life is it if you force yourself to do things you hate all the time?

And here’s the thing: if you try to make a habit of something you don’t like doing, you’re almost sure to fail.  I know, because I’ve tried it many times. If I find myself saying, “I hate this, but I can do it!” then it’s an uphill battle, and one I almost always lose. Because after a week or two of doing this, you’ll lose enthusiasm. You’ll run out of the incredible energy required to form a new habit, and then miss the habit one day, and another day, and soon it’s over.

But look at the opposite scenario — you do something you love doing. Well, how hard is it to motivate yourself to do this? You look forward to it. You are excited about it. When you actually do the habit, you’re happy, and your overall experience is positive. That’s a habit that is much more likely to stick. “

This is exactly what we have found with our experience with hundreds upon hundreds of McQuaig behavioural profiles of managers who find it difficult to be leaders.  They are trying to adopt habits they cannot enjoy.


… And it was so predictable.

Competency modelling…

Some companies create and use a leadership competency model to prevent selection errors. Even so, subjectivity creeps in all too easily, resulting in the wrong people being placed in leadership positions.  Yet this situation is relatively simple to avoid.

So what is the solution?

The answer is to find the causes of ineffective leadership and then address them.

Selecting and Developing REAL Leaders is one major part of the solution.

We also have to focus on the other factors surrounding a person in the workplace.

Just one example from the various kinds of situation we come across is a dynamic and decisive goal-oriented leader being taken on to turn around an ailing unit.

However, within 3-6 months the new incumbent has quit because every time he wanted to initiate an important and much-needed change, the CEO would not permit it, wanting status quo to prevail.

A case of the right person for the job but not right for the culture.

In Summary:

  • Select REAL leaders — use The McQuaig System™ to identify them clearly.
  • Use L&D budget effectively — give new habits that REAL leaders will love to have.
  • Look at other factors influencing managers’ behaviour, including such things as culture.





Increasing Engagement – Case Study

June 26th, 2010 | 566 views | Rss Feed

The Client: one of the largest mutual assurance societies in the UK.

The Challenge: Annual appraisals were not being used effectively, and this was confirmed by an in-house attitude survey focussing on the appraisal system. Typical comments were: ‘Managers aren’t interested in the appraisals – it’s just a chore for them.”

The Proposal: The Society was using the McQuaig System™ and it was suggested that this be incorporated into the solution.

  • A practical Appraisal Workshop was held to help managers focus on creating a positive and results-oriented experience for their direct reports.

  • The Workshop was also designed for performance improvement.

  • Using their McQuaig System™ reports, helped Managers understand their natural leadership style and how to adapt in order to be more successful.

  • Coaching, with McQuaig support, to help Managers understand how to approach each direct report and bring out the best in them, both during the Appraisal Review and ongoing.

The Business Impact: Management changes have been implemented in two ways to solve problems that have been identified.

  • Certain job specifications and responsibilities have altered, to move people into areas to which they are more naturally suited.

  • Managers have deliberately refined their management styles as appropriate to their staff.

The Client feedback: “The evaluations have caused a revelation every time. Why? Because they revealed that the roots of performance problems did not necessarily lie with the staff member, but sometimes with the manager him/herself.”



Retaining Staff – Case Study

June 26th, 2010 | 841 views | Rss Feed

The Client: a Call Centre.

The Challenge: The call centre manager tried to hire the right people to handle incoming calls from customers. He looked for ‘people’ people, who were friendly, outgoing and sociable.

However, he found attrition rates climbed as productivity rates fell.

The Proposal: Use the McQuaig System™ to benchmark what behavioural competencies gave better success.

The Findings: After analysing the situation, it was found that the top producers were not in fact the friendly and outgoing people at all. Instead, it was those who tended to be more reserved and kept to themselves.

These apparently unusual findings were confirmed by the client when questions were raised:

  • The sociable people weren’t getting the degree of people interaction they needed from customers, so they would find reasons for going to chat with colleagues, causing distractions.
  • With customer calls, they tended to engage in lengthy conversations instead of just resolving the problem as quickly as possible.
  • By contrast, the less sociable, task-oriented people listened to customers patiently and cut to the chase in terms of diagnosing and remedying their problems.

The Business Impact: Revamping the recruitment criteria and using the McQuaig System™ for objective assessment of behavioural competencies against the high performance benchmark resulted in staff better suited to the job demands.

Consequently, attrition reduced while morale and productivity increased.



Further refinements to McQuaig Reports

April 27th, 2010 | 1,204 views | Rss Feed

The McQuaig Institute has made some important changes to the Word Survey Reports.  We quote from their notification…

Strategies For Coaching And Developing Report

Customers have told us that line managers find this report (often referred to as the “Do’s and Don’ts” report) valuable when coaching and communicating with employees, especially during employee orientation and performance management.

We have updated the wording so that it articulates expected on-the-job behaviours more clearly. This will provide managers with more concrete suggestions about how to coach their employees through challenging situations.

The most significant changes in the Don’ts of low Dominant profiles which now now more clearly reflects on-the-job challenges, especially in management or leadership roles.  Two examples:

…don’t delegate control of a difficult group to him – his team-oriented approach may be less effective with strong personalities
…don’t expect her to provide you with a guesstimate – she needs to know all the specifics before committing to something

The greater clarity and specifics should enhance the use of this coaching and development tool for your managers.

Transition Profiles

Transition profiles are defined by the close proximately of an individual’s Dominant and Compliant scores. People typically do not display equal amounts of these traits over time.

It has always been a goal of The Institute to keep our report wording non-academic and straightforward enough so that the typical line manager will find value in the reports, and transition profiles have been somewhat challenging in this regard. Moreover, we have taken to heart some of the feedback clients have given us, such as:

* The term transition implies that a person may be going through a change in their personal life at this point in time and may encourage interviewers to delve into areas that are not job-related, thus making the interview more subjective. While we still state that the person is exhibiting some contradictory and inconsistent behaviours and emphasize that his/her behaviour is likely to change over time, we no longer use the term transition.

* The transition “warnings” or “cautions” show up on every report in the Word Survey and the cumulative impact can distract from the rest of the report. These have been reduced.

* There is an increasing push to get information out “to the field” where line managers or other untrained interpreters are left to interpret what the term transition means. We have re-focused and put the emphasis on their balance and flexibility.



Save time & effort on large-scale recruitment

April 9th, 2010 | 749 views | Rss Feed

We are working on support for high-volume recruiters to save them time when assessing candidates’ behavioural strengths against a role using the McQuaig System™.

There are two main areas of labour-intensive work:

1. Information input into McQuaig Online.

2. Sifting through the candidate results to identify those who closely match the demands of the job to enable you to focus on these immediately and in-depth.

We are aiming to offer to take this work off your plates.  Time is short enough as it is, so this will enable you to focus on the real work of recruitment & selection.

Get in touch if this is important to you.



Welcome to CV-India Blog

April 3rd, 2010 | 809 views | Rss Feed

Thank you for dropping by.

In our blog, we will note down things that we think will be of interest to you.  Musings, items found in the media, details of any events we may be running or attending as well as updates on our activities.

Come back often and why not subscribe to the RSS and, while you are at it, sign up for our quarterly Newsletter?